Amazons IV — Jan Little: Deaf, Blind, and Alone in Amazonia

In the remotest Amazonian jungle, off the Rio Negro — which the Indians called the River of Hunger, and for good reason — Jan Little, blind and deaf and emaciated with hunger, exhaustion, and grief, had managed to heat a little soup and turned towards her hammock. She had seen or heard no one for over four months in jungle isolation. As she felt her way to the hammock, she sensed a hand on her bare arm.

John Man in his book about Jan Little wrote, “[There] was nothing but river and jungle. A clearing was nothing against it. Here, the wilderness was all, a force that would, given the chance, embrace, permeate, and ingest anything that intruded upon it — clearings, people, life itself.”

Unlike Isabela Godin and Raiza Ruiz, whom I wrote about in Amazons II and Amazons III, Jan Little, her husband, Harry, and daughter, Becca, did not wish to return to Vermont or California whence they hailed. And unlike the warrior women described by Francisco de Orellana and Fr. Gaspar de Carvajal (Amazons I), Jan was not of the jungle nor from the jungle, nor was she in a region of the jungle capable of producing life-sustaining nutrition, as were the Amazons.

Harry Little was determined to succeed as a homesteader in the jungle, as far away from the nearest settlement, road, and neighbor as it was possible to be. His intense focus and energy brought Jan and Becca under his spell, a spell that only death would eventually break.

After a decade in the jungles of southern Mexico, angry by the Mexican authorities’ decision to build a road that would traverse not far from their homestead and offended by his perception that the authorities had not been fair with the Lacandones Indians who lived in that jungle, Harry uprooted himself, his wife, and his stepdaughter and arrived in Guyana, South America, making plans and arrangements to travel by rivers into the most forbidding reaches of the Amazonian jungle.

He eventually decided on homesteading in the Sierra Neblinas in what is now the Venezuelan state of Amazonas. However, Venezuelan politics intruded, and that plan had to be discarded, leaving the three stranded in Cucuí, Brazil, a town on the shores of the Rio Negro, which borders Amazonas, Venezuela. 

One day, as was often the case with Harry, he was inspired to go to Serra do Padre, now known as Serra de Bela Adormecida (or Serra do Curicuriari) which locals told him was inaccessible. The Littles were persistent and eventually found men who would take them up the Rio Demiti, which was no more than swamps for a good portion of the way. They promised to, in effect, be their contact with the outside world by coming to them with supplies and mail and vice versa whenever the river was high enough to at least wade.

And so, they lived and produced — but very little as the soil and its depth were not conducive to agriculture. Over the years they cleared a “garden clearing” and a “nursery clearing” and a “pineapple clearing”, plus built two huts, one not too far from the water, the other higher up where on the rare clear days the Pico da Neblina could be seen. All this was described to Jan by Harry and Becca, her daughter.

This was a life of complete isolation, the only contact being the “cargo men” who would come when they could. Often “when they could” would be months from the last supply and the Littles were left to rationing the little grain they had from their last supply run. Some herbs grew but nothing near what was needed to maintain life.

They were able to finance the supplies and food with the Social Security and disability monies that were mailed to them from back home. Apparently, Harry never saw the irony: he hated “civilization” (and made that very clear, even to the point of cutting Jan and Becca off from Jan’s loving family), but he survived on what they received from the society he so despised.

Towards the end of the year 1979, they fell ill. Was it an unknown jungle virus? We don’t know. Malaria had been eradicated years before and Jan narrates that the symptoms were not malarial, which she and Harry had both battled in years past in Mexico. 

Whatever it was, it weakened them to the point of inactivity.

One day, not hearing Becca, who by that time had been the most energetic of the three, doing the work of two men or more, Jan asked about her. “She’s finished,” said Harry. “She didn’t make it.”

The next morning, “You need to take the body out.” As sick and weak as Jan was, Harry was even sicker.

She dropped herself from the hammock, crawled to where Harry told her the body had fallen. Gathering all her strength, with effort she did not know she could muster, she wrapped Becca’s wasted body in her hammock and said, “I cannot move her, Harry!” 

“You must! Drag it to the ditch.” Harry was adamant that Jan not refer to Becca’s body as “her” but as “it”. 

Jan could barely crawl to the entryway of the hut alone. Now she was to not only crawl, but also drag her daughter’s body to the entryway and much beyond.

She pulled and fell exhausted. She had moved only an inch. She pulled again. And again. Inch by inch, hour after hour, she dragged her daughter’s body outside as far as she could drag it. Then she crawled back inside.

After two months, Harry died. And Jan did this all over again, except that by this time she had regained some strength, having eaten kernels of corn from a can, one kernel at a time.

All alone, deaf and blind; emaciated with hunger; she determined to make it. She determined to survive. 

Using her powers of memory and typewriter ribbon in lieu of rope to palpably mark her way, over a period of days, she made her way to the hut up the hill, knowing that one mistake in direction would most probably mean death. But she found it and was able to put much needed supplies in a sack and bring it down to the main hut. 

At this time in world events hostages taken from the American embassy were being held in Iran. The guerrilla war against the Soviets was bearing fruit in Afghanistan. Mount St. Helens was signaling a soon to come eruption. A funeral event attended by presidents and prime ministers took place in Belgrade as Josep Tito, the Communist dictator of Yugoslavia was buried. British Special Forces stormed the Iranian embassy in London to rescue hostages. And all the while, Jan Little, with typewriter ribbon, a long staff to fend off serpents, and her sharp memory, felt her way around “Homestead Hill” and did her best to survive.

One day, on her way back from the higher hut, she smelled pineapple. Remembering their failed attempts at harvesting crops, she followed where she remembered the pineapple clearing to have been. Reaching down, she touched the shrubby top of a pineapple. Overjoyed, she took it to the hut and could not describe the sweet, fresh sensation of the fruit and juice trickling in her mouth.

A few days after that, she felt the hand on her arm.

The men did not want to linger. The stench and the squalor were great. And the sight of Jan, blind and deaf, and emaciated, like a dead woman walking, stirred up ancient superstitions.

Harry Little did not appreciate other people. I would not go as far as to say he hated others; however, his self-centeredness did reflect itself in his lack of courtesy, appreciation, love for others, even his wife and stepdaughter. He said he was a Christian and insisted that the life he was creating was the Christian ideal. 

No. Sorry, Harry, it is nowhere near the Christian ideal, which, in a society of believers and unbelievers, calls for a cooperative approach to life: the rural area needs the urban for its markets, the urban needs the rural for its food, for instance. But most of all, the Christian ideal calls for a love of neighbor, something lacking, to put it mildly, in Harry.

Harry should have read the Mayflower Compact and the history behind it. He would have seen that half the signers were not of the Pilgrim congregation. But they had to devise a means of living among one another in peace. And they succeeded.

Another possibility for cause of death? Starvation. Jan Little would almost certainly deny this vehemently. Nevertheless, it most certainly seems to fit the bill.

Jan Little eventually returned to Sacramento, California, and reestablished loving ties with her parents, whom she cared for until their deaths. She died in 2018 at the age of eighty-eight.

The Cucuí rock near the town.
Serranía la Neblina in Amazonas, Venezuela, where the Littles had originally intended to make their homestead.
Pico da Neblina, in Brazil, which could rarely be seen from the Little’s homestead as it was usually shrouded in fog and clouds.
Area — Serra da Bela Adormecida — where the Littles determined to build a homestead. I cannot find photos of the exact area, but this gives a picture of the remoteness.
The book written by John Man with Jan Little (she is credited in the acknowledgments)

Ranchitos I

In Venezuela, ranchitos (or barrios) are like Brazil’s favelas, the shanty towns which grew around Rio de Janeiro and now are ubiquitous in metropolitan areas throughout Brazil. Argentina has Villa Miseria or asentamientos; Chile has campamentos; Colombia, tugurios; and so on. 

To generalize, these are “informal settlements.” Man-on-the-street terms range from slums to shacks to squatter settlements, etc. 

They are a sight to behold.

A visitor to the once dynamic, modern, enterprising city of Caracas is amazed as he emerges from one of the last tunnels leading from the international airport in Maiquetía, and, before getting a glimpse of the capital city’s shiny skyscrapers, he is slapped with a view of colorful, makeshift, paper shacks, stacked sky-high, side by side, grasping the massive mountainsides for miles.

“Who lives here?! Who can live here?”

By latest estimates, about 700,000 in Argentina, 48,000 in Chile, 300,000 in Colombia, and 12,000,000 in Brazil. About 1,000,000 Venezuelans make their homes in ranchitos, 800,000 of which are in Caracas. But the Venezuela figures are old and suspect. Meaning, the numbers now are likely higher.

What caused these to begin with?

In the case of Venezuela, a few sources says the “oil boom” was to blame. However, that boom began in the early 20th century, whereas the ranchitos exploded in the late 1950’s and early 1960’s.

Other sources simply presuppose the ranchitos and just report the headache these are to different politicians in different eras. One source actually said that Hugo Chavez was the first politician to declare “war” on the ranchitos, which is laughable propaganda. Hearing about governments’ plans to attack the ranchitos takes me back to my childhood, which long preceeded Chavez.

I recently asked my dear 89-year-old mother what she could recall regarding the origins of the ranchitos.

“I remember when they began appearing. The usual commentary was that they were poor people leaving the conucos [small family farms] and coming to the capital city on the basis of promises of high-paying jobs, which did not materialize for them.”

But why did they come in the mid-twentieth century and not before?

This is not a mere academic matter. As I’ve written in other posts, most recently in the post on Spain and the Reformation (Spain and the Reformation), “…North, Central, and South America have more in common with one another than is usually assumed….” Perhaps by understanding at least some of the causes behind the ranchitos of Venezuela, we would not only better understand our neighbor(s), but we might even avoid some of the pitfalls that have bedeviled them.

First, we’ll review the encomienda system brought to the New World during the Spanish discovery and conquest. Future posts will look at the hacienda system and subsequent “land reforms”, which have been the bane of peoples around the globe and yet continue to function as a siren call to many.

The much-maligned encomienda system was intended to protect and instruct the native population. In general, the system “granted” areas or regions to the Spanish Conquistadores, soldiers, and other pioneers with the encomienda — the trust, the charge, the responsibility — to protect, evangelize, and catechize all the peoples in their areas, their encomendados.

Significantly, this did not include a transfer of land ownership. The Crown insisted the land revert to the native population. The encomendero — the receiver of the grant — could exact tribute from the peoples in their encomienda in the form of minerals, produce, or labor. 

In addition, the encomenderos were required to pay tribute to the crown and, as if that weren’t disincentive enough, the grants’ durations were limited to no more than two successive generations.

Had the Crown or its ministers somehow have been able to travel to the future century and read William Bradford’s Of Plymouth Colony they would have anticipated the deadly flaw in such an arrangement. Without ownership, incentives for industry and production were disfigured. Good men did their best but also had to look out for their own interests, including, in the case of many, outright confiscations of the lands, albeit with kind treatment of the natives, in many cases also granting them small parcels of land outright. Others, in effect, mistreated and enslaved the Indians. These are the ones who ended up incentivizing Bartolomé de las Casas to produce his dangerous broad-brush propaganda, which caused havoc in subsequent centuries and which is so much with us to this very day. For more on the monk and his writings, refer to the post, Simón Bolivar (Simon Bolivar).

The encomienda system produced gratifying results early on, including decent education and learning of the Spanish language, something that genuinely impressed the anti-Spaniard, Alexander Humboldt. But overall it did not render good fruit and was officially ended in the late 18th century, although historical records reflect no new conferments of encomiendas after 1721.

It is instructive to note that the encomienda system was in effect in Spain itself, but with one critical difference: in Spain, unlike in the New World, the encomenderos were actually granted title to the lands.

To her credit, Spain believed that once the Indios had been catechized and educated they would become good subjects of the Spanish crown and would be treated as such, ownership of land. This helps explain why the Latin American wars for independence required so much malignment of Spain, including resurrecting Bartolomé de las Casas to once again preach his hatred. And despite the relentless propaganda, many 19th-century Latin Americans disbelieved their betters and resisted the wars. Hence, the unbelievable bloodletting, especially in Venezuela with 33% of its population eradicated. It’s been persuasively argued that those wars were actually civil wars as opposed to wars for independence.

What followed the encomienda system was the equally-maligned hacienda system, which was an improvement, and which depended much on the character of the hacendados.

This “ancient history” is important and is with us still. For example, many of the original land holdings in Texas originated from Spanish land grants which were honored by the Texas Republic after independence. The beginnings of the world-renowned King Ranch are marked by Captain King’s purchase of a 15,500-acre Mexican land grant in the mid-19th century.

What’s more, Captain King himself established a sort of encomienda wherein, during a devastating drought where the people of Cruillas in the Mexican state of Tamaulipas, in order to survive, sold him all their cattle. As he and his men rode the herd back to his ranch in Texas, he suddenly realized the people of Cruillas would not survive. He turned his horse and he and his men rode back and offered the people protection and pay if they came with him and worked in his ranch along with his men. The people agreed and became known as LosKiñenos, whose descendants still work at the ranch.

And do not live in ranchitos.

We will look at the hacienda system in a future post.

Ranchitos around the capital city of Caracas, Venezuela
One can still find conucos.
Bartolomé de las Casas
King Ranch, Texas
Captain Richard King
Some of Los Kiñenos

Humanitarian Crisis

As stated in the “About” page of this blog, my sincere intent is to tell about Venezuela irenically. I want to avoid polemics here, not because polemics are bad or unimportant; they are not. They play a role in aiding our understanding of events and even life and death issues. However, in these polarized times, it is most necessary to first go back to basics. Vince Lombardi once addressed his team after a terrible first half performance and, holding a football aloft, he declared, “Gentlemen, this is a football.” Hard to polemicize about that. And that sort of explains what this blog attempts to do.

So, you may wonder why I might bring up the current humanitarian situation in Venezuela here. Is there sufficient reporting about that readily available in the media? Are there enough debates on Venezuelan Socialism? Are there ample arguments on the competence of the government there?

The obvious answers to the above interrogatives are, of course, “yes, yes, and yes.”

But, and here I must tread on some toes: the reporting is nowhere near thorough.

There is indeed a crisis. And the poor and the indigenous peoples are those who suffer the most.

Today (this was written, mostly, on February 22, 2019), one of the trucks loaded with medicines and food, was burned as it crossed the Colombian frontier onto Venezuelan soil. See photo below and caption for additional commentary.

At the other entry point, in the south, specifically at Kumaracapay, Gran Sabana municipality, near the Venezuela-Brazil border, the actions taken by the national police painted an even worse picture: 

From the Caracas Chronicles:

“Chavista officials say there was a shootout, a fight at the border. There was not, they gunned us down!” Very few times I’ve spoken to a man like Aldemaro Pérez. A 36 year-old indigenous leader, he speaks in plain terms, but unambiguously.”

“Is it true there are two Pemones [indigenous Venezuelans] dead?”, I ask.

“That’s absolutely true. We were near the border (with Brazil) expecting what we really want, the humanitarian aid. At five in the morning, a group of soldiers arrived trying to block the border. We tried to stop them, and they shot at us.”

“They killed two of us, Zoraida Rodriguez and her husband, and now we have four national guardsmen arrested. Three lieutenants and a sergeant, they’re our prisoners.”

After filing the above report, Aldemaro Pérez and four other Pemon Indians were arrested by the national police. Their whereabouts are unknown. The four police who had been arrested by the Indians for their atrocities are no longer in Pemon custody.

Seven of the fifteen people shot have since died.

(Above: Friendly fire? Food and medicine burning at the Colombia border. It may have been inadvertently set alight by the Venezuelans who were tossing Molotov Cocktails to disperse the government troops from blocking the truck coming to them. They may have missed and set fire to the truck itself. Others insist that the government forces themselves set the aid on fire. Reporting is sketchy. I cannot confirm either version)

“‘We don’t understand how a policeman can do this. How can they shoot their own people? Why wouldn’t they care they are sick and starving? Why would they burn medicine?’ said a member of the Colombian police while the truck with humanitarian aid burned on the Venezuelan side.”

Many headlines in the United States and Europe have noted the blocked humanitarian aid. Many have also reported the deaths of “protesters.” 

However, relatively few have reported the loss of food and medicines and almost no one has emphasized that the dead and wounded — some critically — are indigenous people in desperate need of help. In other words, they are Native American Indians. Twenty-five are missing. Either they fled to the jungles of Venezuela and Brazil or they are detained in undisclosed locations or they are dead.

“… the locals know the regime brought 80 buses full of armed people, so nobody’s going out. ‘This is a ghost town today, and let me be frank with you,” says our man, “We feel abandoned. We feel isolated. Everyone was supporting us until this attack began and now we’re alone and we’re cut off from the rest of the country. How are we supposed to defend ourselves if those attacking are our supposed protectors?”

This area is rich in gold. Might that explain the state’s zealotry?

In a time when just about anything is an outrage and an offense, one would think that shooting unarmed, defenseless, destitute, and ill Indians, in addition to starving them, would merit at least more extensive reporting, let alone a bit of sympathy.

One of the most “left-leaning progressive” Democratic presidential candidates has called for support of the Venezuelan people who are fleeing the dictatorship. In effect, such a pronouncement puts that candidate pretty much in agreement with the President she hopes to unseat. 

This is not a partisan issue. Nor should it be.

The situation is desperate and very sad.

Pray for Venezuela.

a pemon girl